Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


The 1982 Movie Poltergeist Used Real Skeletons As Set Decoration

the 1982 movie poltergeist used real skeletons as - tymoff

Few movies have made a more lasting impression on people than the iconic the 1982 movie poltergeist used real skeletons as – tymoff movie Poltergeist. But a surprising secret about this film has emerged: it was filmed using real skeletons.

In ghostlore, a poltergeist is responsible for physical disturbances such as noises and objects being moved. It is also alleged to cause pain and other physical harm.

The Poltergeist Curse

Poltergeist is an undisputed classic in the horror genre, delivering bone-chilling thrills and a legacy that has impacted popular culture. The film’s success has fueled conversations about the ethics of filmmaking and the role of entertainment in society. However, many people are unaware of the dark secret behind the film’s production. This secret reveals that the Poltergeist movie used real skeletons, a fact that has sparked controversy and raised questions about the morality of using human remains in filmmaking.

The film was shot on location in the Simi Valley area of California in early 1982, before the advent of CGI technology. Tobe Hooper directed the movie, which was produced by Steven Spielberg and starring Heather O’Rourke as Carol Anne Freeling, a family that is haunted by spirits. The spirits seem particularly interested in the youngest daughter, Carol Anne. During the filming of Poltergeist, a number of incidents occurred on set that sparked superstitious chatter among crew members and cast members. One such incident was when the mother of one of the actors fell into a hole intended for a swimming pool. As the hole filled with rainwater, skeletons began to float to the surface surrounding her.

As a result of the skeleton-related misfortune, some believe that a curse has befallen the film and its subsequent sequels. The curse is said to be caused by the use of real skeletons in the film. While the curse is probably a hoax, the events that surround it are certainly interesting.

While the use of real skeletons was not illegal at the time, it has raised ethical concerns and prompted discussion about the role of the film industry in society. Today, regulations and guidelines exist to ensure that the use of human remains is handled with sensitivity and respect.

The skeleton curse is just one of the many strange occurrences that have affected those involved with Poltergeist and its sequels. Other bizarre incidents have included the death of actor Julian Beck who played schizophrenic preacher Henry Kane in Poltergeist II, the strangulation of actress Dominique Dunne by her boyfriend in her driveway just weeks after the release of the movie, and the murder of Lou Perryman, who played Pugsley in Poltergeist III. While there is no proof that these incidents are linked to the film, they certainly add to its mystique and have made Poltergeist a legendary horror film.

The Skeletons

The Poltergeist franchise is known for its spine-tingling plot and unsettling special effects, but the film also has a dark secret that goes far beyond the movie’s creepy moments. It turns out that real skeletons were used during the production of Poltergeist, and this revelation has sparked conversations about the ethics of filmmaking and the role of the entertainment industry in shaping our culture.

The use of real skeletons added an unsettling level of authenticity to the film’s supernatural elements. From the infamous swimming pool scene to the apparitions that haunted the Freeling family, the use of real remains added an unnerving layer to the movie that has shaped its legacy. In addition, the use of real skeletons added an element of realism that would be impossible to recreate with CGI.

While the use of real skeletons may have been considered controversial at the time, it is important to remember that the film industry has always struggled with the intersection of art and ethics. The use of real skeletons in Poltergeist is an example of the way in which filmmakers often place artistic integrity above all other considerations.

In many cases, the decisions made during the production of a movie have long-lasting consequences for actors and crew members. For instance, the use of real skeletons in the swimming pool scene caused great discomfort for actress Heather O’Rourke. She was worried that she would be electrocuted if a light fell in the water, and Spielberg had to reassure her that there was no danger.

Although O’Rourke was not directly involved in the production of Poltergeist, she and her family were plagued with tragedies after the film’s release. O’Rourke’s younger sister died of leukemia, and two other cast members suffered from cancer and kidney issues. The deaths have been attributed to the curse of the film, which some believe is related to the use of real skeletons.

While the use of real skeletons in poltergeist was not illegal at the time, it is important to note that ethical considerations have evolved since then. The use of real skeletons is one of the many behind-the-scenes secrets that has sparked conversations about the ethics of the film industry and its responsibility to respect the deceased.

Poltergeist II: The Other Side

While it isn’t as good as the original film, Poltergeist II is still an entertaining horror movie. Despite the fact that it was a sequel, it managed to tell a compelling story that stood on its own. It also featured some great special effects that were a testament to the power of 1980s practical effects. Moreover, it features some very good performances from the cast.

The film begins with an inexplicable Native American ritual that takes place high up on a windy mountain. The opening removes some of the ambiguity and slowly builds up a sense of dread. Unfortunately, it also prevents the story from being able to take off into an original direction. As a result, it lacks the power of the first Poltergeist.

This movie also suffers from the same problem as many sequels, which is that it tries to build up too much mythology without giving the audience a chance to connect with it. In addition, it retreads the same territory as the original by focusing on Kane and trying to get Carol Anne back.

Moreover, the film doesn’t address the death of the actress who played Dana Freeling in the original. Dominique Dunne was murdered by her boyfriend shortly after the release of the first film. It is unfortunate that the film didn’t try to find another actress for the role.

The only thing that saves this film is the presence of a very scary character in the form of Reverend Henry Kane. Julian Beck, who is well known for his work on films such as Raw Meat, delivers a chilling performance that is probably the best part of the film. He is especially effective in the scene where he tries to gain entry into the house where the Freeling family is staying. Nevertheless, it isn’t enough to save this film from being a mediocre sequel.

Poltergeist III: The Other Side

The 1982 movie Poltergeist was a hit and, being the ’80s, the film got a sequel. Poltergeist II and III were hardly essential films, and it’s easy to understand why fans of the original would be annoyed by their sequels. The movies are weighed down with too much mythology and unnecessary characters.

In Poltergeist II, the Freeling family (minus daughter Dana) finds themselves battling spirits once again. They’re targeted by a supernatural beast, which turns out to be the spirit of Reverend Kane, who was responsible for the deaths of people buried beneath their former home. This time, Kane wants to take the family’s daughter Carol Anne away with him.

Carol Anne and Tangina are psychics, capable of seeing ghosts that others cannot see. This proves helpful, as the ghosts that haunt the Freelings are Kane’s henchmen who are trying to kidnap Carol Anne. The spirit world is a dangerous place, and the henchmen are determined to kill the family. It’s up to Tangina and Carol Anne to fight them off.

Poltergeist III is an interesting horror film. It’s dark, and it tries to be a bit more serious than its predecessor. But it still feels like a Poltergeist sequel, which is a shame because it’s actually a pretty cool movie. It’s a bit more focused than the second film and it’s directed by Gary Sherman, who was also behind underrated horror flicks like Raw Meat and Dead & Buried.


One thing that’s interesting about Poltergeist III is that it doesn’t really focus on Kane as much as the previous movie. He’s shown mostly through reflections in mirrors and windows, but he doesn’t get as many scenes as he did in the last movie. This might be because Julian Black, who played Kane, died just a few months before the movie’s release, so the filmmakers didn’t want to spend too much time on his character.

Poltergeist III is the weakest link in the trilogy, but it’s still worth watching for its eeriness and for the great performances from its leads. Plus, the special effects are still impressive, even though they seem dated by today’s standards.


  1. Did the 1982 movie “Poltergeist” really use real skeletons in the film? Yes, it’s true. The production team of “Poltergeist” used real human skeletons during the making of the film. This fact has sparked controversy and curiosity among viewers for decades.
  2. Why did the filmmakers choose to use real skeletons in “Poltergeist”? The decision to use real skeletons was primarily driven by budget constraints and practical considerations. Real human skeletons were cheaper and more readily available than synthetic ones at the time of filming.
  3. Were there any ethical concerns or controversies surrounding the use of real skeletons in the movie? Yes, the use of real skeletons in “Poltergeist” generated ethical concerns and controversy. Some members of the cast and crew, as well as the general public, raised questions about the appropriateness of using human remains for entertainment purposes. This controversy continues to be a topic of discussion among fans and scholars.
  4. Have there been any legal consequences or investigations related to the use of real skeletons in the film? There were no legal consequences or investigations directly related to the use of real skeletons in “Poltergeist.” However, it did raise awareness about the need for clearer regulations and ethical guidelines regarding the use of human remains in the film industry.
  5. Have there been any changes in filmmaking practices or regulations as a result of the controversy surrounding “Poltergeist”? While there were no immediate changes in filmmaking practices or regulations following the release of “Poltergeist,” the controversy did contribute to discussions about ethical standards in the industry. In subsequent years, there have been efforts to establish stricter guidelines for the use of human remains in films, emphasizing respect for the deceased and transparency in sourcing such materials.

You May Also Like


The tech world is filled with bells and whistles. Homo sapiens use countless of these and have named them with unique terms. Years ago,...

Home Decore

There’s no greater feeling than being able to enjoy the benefits of a simple DIY project. If you’ve been wanting to discover ways to add...


Introduction of Ibomma: A lot of users use iBOMMA famous torrent website to download films for free. It is a popular public torrent site that...


https // Not working? If your Spotify is not working properly then you have to check these points: Make sure to restart the Spotify...